About the Institute
The Institute for Epistemic Stability (IES) is an independent research organization dedicated to developing experimental methodologies for navigating contested information environments.
Founded in response to the escalating crisis of institutional trust and the fragmentation of shared epistemic standards, IES operates at the intersection of information science, political theory, and experimental governance. We do not claim to have solved the problem of knowledge in polarized societies. We are working on making the problem more interesting.
Our approach is characterized by several commitments:
- Epistemic Humility: We acknowledge the limits of institutional authority in adjudicating contested claims, and we design our methodologies to make these limits visible rather than obscuring them behind claims of expertise.
- Procedural Innovation: Rather than attempting to perfect traditional approaches to fact-checking and truth-determination, we explore alternative procedural mechanisms that may be more appropriate for conditions of radical disagreement.
- Radical Transparency: All of our methodologies, funding sources, and governance structures are publicly documented. We believe that transparency is a prerequisite for legitimate epistemic authority in the current environment.
- Productive Provocation: We design interventions that surface unexamined assumptions about truth, authority, and institutional legitimacy. Our work is intended to generate useful questions, not necessarily to provide comfortable answers.
IES is not affiliated with any political party, government agency, or commercial interest. We are committed to maintaining intellectual independence while engaging seriously with the real-world implications of our research.
Current Projects
Unbiased Fact Verification Framework (UFVF)
A stochastic approach to fact-checking that separates evidence documentation from verdict generation.
Learn moreRandomized Adjudication Platform (RAP)
The pilot implementation of UFVF, processing user-submitted claims through the Stochastic Adjudication Protocol.
Learn moreExperimental Governance Tools
Research into alternative mechanisms for institutional decision-making under conditions of contested legitimacy.
Epistemic Fragmentation Studies
Ongoing research into the causes and consequences of divergent standards for truth-evaluation across communities.
Contact
General Inquiries
info@factverification.orgMedia & Press
media@factverification.orgResearch Collaboration
collaboration@factverification.orgData Requests
data@factverification.orgWe do not adjudicate individual disputes submitted via email. For claim submissions, please use the Randomized Adjudication Platform when available.